The Info Web

Department of Defense

Executive department of the U.S. federal government that coordinates and supervises all agencies and functions concerned directly with national security and the armed forces.

1947 · Arlington, Virginia

The Department of Defense (DoD) is an executive branch department of the U.S. federal government charged with coordinating and supervising all agencies and functions of the government concerned directly with national security and the United States.1

In the context of psychic research, the DoD played a significant role, particularly after the CIA's initial involvement. The DoD became the primary sponsor of the Stargate Project, overseeing its various phases and applications for military and intelligence purposes. Figures like William Perry and Richard DeLauer were involved in funding decisions for these programs.1

The DoD's interest in psi phenomena was often driven by concerns about perceived advancements in Soviet and Chinese psychic research, leading to programs aimed at understanding and potentially weaponizing these abilities. This included research into Psychotronic Weapons and the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation, as seen in Project Pandora and the work of scientists like Allan H. Frey and Robert O. Becker.1

Role in UAP Investigation and Modern Programs

The DoD has been the primary government entity responsible for the investigation of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) for over seventy years. The DoD's involvement with the UAP issue dates back to at least the Roswell Incident in 1947. Since then, it has been responsible for a series of official and unofficial programs to investigate the phenomenon, including Project Blue Book, the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), the UAP Task Force, and the current All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO).2

However, the DoD has also been the primary source of the official secrecy and denial that has surrounded the UAP topic for decades. According to Luis Elizondo and other whistleblowers, the DoD has actively worked to suppress information about UAP, create a stigma around the topic, and mislead the public and Congress. This has been driven by a desire to protect national security, to prevent public panic, and to allow for the secret reverse-engineering of recovered UAP technology by the "Legacy Program."2

Internal Conflict and Recent Developments

The DoD has been the site of significant internal conflict over the UAP issue. The efforts of individuals like Luis Elizondo, Christopher Mellon, and Jay Stratton to bring the issue to the attention of senior leadership have been met with resistance from within the department, including from the alleged "Collins Elite" and the powerful forces behind the "Legacy Program."2

In recent years, however, the DoD has been forced to take the UAP issue more seriously due to pressure from Congress and the public. The department has officially released UAP videos, produced public reports on the phenomenon, and established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to standardize the collection and analysis of UAP data. Despite these steps towards transparency, the DoD continues to be criticized for its lack of openness and its failure to provide a full accounting of its historical involvement with the UAP issue.2

Relationships 5

Owned
  • Camp Peary, from 1952, Armed Forces Experimental Training Activity2
Headed by
Members
Contractors
  • Anthropic, 2025–2026, CDAO prototype agreement up to 200 million dollars; designated a supply-chain risk20
  1. Jacobsen, Annie. Phenomena: The Secret History of the U.S. Government's Investigations into Extrasensory Perception and Psychokinesis. Little, Brown and Company, 2017. ↩
  2. Elizondo, Luis. Imminent. William Morrow, 2024. ↩

Named without a link 1

Find a path

Full finder →

Find a chain of links from this entry to another.

FromDepartment of Defense

    Local network

    Search or select an entry to see how it connects to Department of Defense.

    Options

    An interactive diagram of Department of Defense's connections, drawn on a canvas and explored with a pointer. The same connections are listed as links in the Connected and Mentioned-in sections below.

    Loading connections… Select to explore · double-click to open
    How to read the graph
    Colour shows the entry type or cluster
    • People
    • Organizations
    • Programs
    • Events
    • Concepts
    • Places
    Node size

    Larger = more mentions across the vault.

    Connections

    A link from one entry to another.

    A name mentioned in an entry without a direct link. Toggle these with “Inferred”.

    Highlights

    Gold rings mark entries mentioned across several clusters.

    Orange rings mark your selection.

    Tags