Executive Office for United States Attorneys
The Justice Department office that supervises the U.S. Attorneys, which signed INSLAW's 1982 PROMIS contract and whose project staff, Brewer, Videnieks and Rugh, ran the dispute that Judge Bason found was a scheme to take the software by fraud.
The Executive Office for United States Attorneys is the Department of Justice office, established by Attorney General Order No. 8-53 of April 6, 1953, under Herbert Brownell, that provides executive assistance and supervision to the United States Attorneys in the federal districts. It evaluates their performance, coordinates them with other agencies, maintains the United States Attorneys' Manual, runs their legal training, supports the Attorney General's Advisory Committee, sets policy for collecting criminal fines, handles their budgets, Freedom of Information Act responses, congressional liaison, facilities and security. James R. Browning organized the office as its first chief in 1953. Its directors in the years of the INSLAW dispute were William P. Tyson, from 1977 to 1987, Laurence S. McWhorter, from 1987 to 1992, and Anthony Moscato, acting director and then director from 1992 to 1994, followed by Carol DiBattiste.1
The PROMIS Contract
In March 1982 INSLAW signed a three-year, ten-million-dollar contract with the office to install PROMIS, the case-tracking system it had developed with LEAA funds, in the twenty largest U.S. Attorneys' offices and word-processing versions in 74 smaller ones. The office's project manager was C. Madison Brewer, a former INSLAW employee dismissed by Bill Hamilton; its contracting officer was Peter Videnieks, and Brewer's deputy and technical representative was Jack Rugh. Within a month of the signing the office and INSLAW were disputing whether the enhanced PROMIS delivered under the contract was proprietary, and in 1983 the office withheld payments and in 1985 INSLAW entered Chapter 11. In September 1987 Bankruptcy Judge George Bason found that the department had taken the software "by trickery, fraud, and deceit," a finding the House Committee on the Judiciary endorsed in 1992 and the special counsel Nicholas J. Bua rejected in 1993. In February 1985, days after the bankruptcy filing, Rugh telephoned the INSLAW programmer Gregory McKain to offer him a job and, by McKain's account, told him the department had learned from the trustees that INSLAW would be in liquidation within sixty days. The office's later director Moscato was accused by Hamilton of helping to deny Bason's reappointment, which he denied to Bua.23
Sources
- U.S. Department of Justice, Report of Special Counsel Nicholas J. Bua, March 1993, p. 186 (Moscato "now Acting Director of EOUSA"). The 1953 order, the list of duties (Justice Manual, Title 3) and the succession of directors other than Moscato are as given in reference summaries of the office; the Justice Manual and the United States Government Manual entries were not examined. ↩
- U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary. The INSLAW Affair, H. Rept. 102-857, September 10, 1992. https://archive.org/details/InslawAffairInvestigativeReport ↩
- U.S. Department of Justice. Report of Special Counsel Nicholas J. Bua to the Attorney General of the United States Regarding the Allegations of Inslaw, Inc., March 1993, pp. 185-186, 211-214. https://archive.org/details/InslawPROMISBuaReport ↩
Named without a link 2
Local network
Search or select an entry to see how it connects to Executive Office for United States Attorneys.
An interactive diagram of Executive Office for United States Attorneys's connections, drawn on a canvas and explored with a pointer. The same connections are listed as links in the Connected and Mentioned-in sections below.
How to read the graph
- People
- Organizations
- Programs
- Events
- Concepts
- Places
Larger = more mentions across the vault.
A link from one entry to another.
A name mentioned in an entry without a direct link. Toggle these with “Inferred”.
Gold rings mark entries mentioned across several clusters.
Orange rings mark your selection.